Are you looking for YouTube Asset Monetization Answers? If yes, here is the latest and updated answer to the Asset Monetization Exam, and Get a free certificate. This article will help you with the YouTube Asset Monetization Answers in the easiest ways.
Free Courses by Google With Certificate
Course | YouTube Asset Monetization |
Provider | Skillshop |
Duration | 5.6hr |
Difficulty | Advanced |
Certification | Yes |
Solved by | Courses Answer |
Use CTRL + F or Find In Page to find questions.
YouTube Asset Monetization Answers
- Which policy is applied in a multi-claim scenario when partners have different match policies?
- Which is a primary metric used by many content owners use to determine revenue distribution to creators?
- What might happen if a partner disregards an asset ownership conflict?
- What type of data is only added to reports after a month has ended?
- An asset is owned by Partner A in Canada and Partner B in Mexico. Partner A has a match policy of Monetize worldwide. Partner B also has a match policy of Monetize worldwide. When user videos are matched and claimed against this asset, which partner earns the revenue?
- If you and other partners own a single asset in different territories, how would Content ID handle claiming against a user-uploaded video?
- It’s July 1 and the finance department needs revenue totals from June for accounting purposes. Where can they find the number they should use?
- Partner A set their ownership of an asset in Japan and Partner B set their ownership of the same asset in Korea. Partner A has a match policy of Monetize worldwide. Partner B has a match policy of Track worldwide. If a user video is matched and claimed against this asset, what is the applied policy?
- What might alert you that someone may be attempting to monetize your assets?
- Why might a partner see data for assets they don’t own in any country?
- What’s the difference between an ownership conflict and a claim?
- Why would you want to check if there are additional claims in the “Other claims” tab for a particular video?”
- Which of the following is a step you would NOT take to identify bad claims?
- Which of these would be a good use case for a custom policy?
- You have a large library of sound recordings, including some old speeches in the public domain. What is the best way to treat them with regard to Content ID?
- How might someone find out which assets are “monetized in all countries”?
- Partners that have repeated issues with Content ID abuse can face:
- In reviewing your disputed claims, you realize you uploaded a 10-minute reference file of your news program that contains a 1-minute clip from a third party. How can you fix this, if the claim results from the embedded clip?
- Who might receive payments by content owners?
- In a multi-claim scenario, one asset has no ownership specified for some territories. Which default match policy would YouTube apply to claims in those territories?
- If a content owner in a multi-claim scenario chooses Takedown, what is the resulting action?
- What would be a good reason to reexamine a custom policy?
- Where can partners find final, reportable revenue information?
- You and another partner have a match policy of Monetize on separate non-music assets. If a user video is claimed by both of your assets, and no other assets, who receives the revenue?
- How could you prevent your YouTube video from being seen in Indonesia?
- How could someone find their revenue by asset by country?
- A video with an increase in views shows no corresponding rise in revenue; why might this happen?
- Which YouTube resource contains final revenue for a month?
- Which statement is true for multi-party ownership of an asset?
- A user video is claimed by two different assets. One asset has ownership in Canada and a match policy of Monetize worldwide. The other asset has ownership worldwide and a match policy of Monetize worldwide. What policy is applied?
- Which statement best describes the Revenue report?
- Which statement is true for manual review of claims?
- A user uploads a mashup video with scenes from two different movies. You own one movie in the U.S. and your match policy is Monetize. The partner who owns the other movie in the U.S. also has a match policy of Monetize. What policy is applied in the U.S.?
- If an asset owner doesn’t set a policy in a territory they have ownership, what policy gets applied?
- What can happen if a video is claimed by multiple assets?
- Why might revenue in the Asset report not match revenue in the Video report?
- Partner A set their ownership of a web asset in U.S. and Canada, and Partner B set their ownership of the same asset in U.S. and Mexico. Partner A has a match policy of Track worldwide. Partner B has a match policy of Block worldwide. What is the result?
- When are claims “routed for manual review”?
- Which policy condition would be effective to earn revenue from short fan-uploaded clips?
- Which downloadable report can help separate ad revenue by asset for payouts?
- Which statement best describes the Ad Rates report?
- What is a key benefit of regularly reviewing your claims?
- Which is a downloadable report?
- What tactic can prevent loss of potential ad revenue?
- You’ve received a warning for over-claiming. What can you do to address this?
- Which of the following is an example of Content ID misuse?
- Which of these examples frequently contribute to invalid claims for sports partners?
Google Certification Course Questions & Answers
FAQ
Yes, these YouTube Asset Monetization answers are 100% correct.
Yes, all these questions are the latest ones to improve your experience. I keep updating the article with the latest answers.
Yes, at the end of the exam, you will be awarded a free certificate when you pass with min score.
Conclusion
That’s all about YouTube Asset Monetization Exam Answers. If you have any further queries drop them in the comments below. It is a great opportunity to learn new skills from industry experts for free and get a certificate.